Are debates worthwhile?

Letter to Editor By Barbara Gurschke, Medford Mail Tribune, September 3 2017

A gambit used by those with marketing skills but a shortage of supporting evidence is to see a public debate. This is because debates conducted before an uninformed audience are won by smooth talking skills and fraudulent claims that the audience doesn’t discern. Thus the uninformed administrator of the EPA, Scott Pruitt, wages a debate on climate science.


0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *